Germany nudges households toward individual, capital‑backed and privately managed retirement accounts as an ageing, shrinking workforce strains the pay‑as‑you‑go system

Germany is preparing an unusually paternal push into the stock market on behalf of its youngest citizens. The federal government plans to seed personal investment accounts for school‑age children and teenagers, paying €10 a month into a default, broadly diversified fund. The aim, officials say, is to get young people invested early, normalise long‑term saving in equities and—decades from now—deliver a pot that complements the public pension.

The move, widely dubbed an “early‑start pension”, represents Berlin’s latest attempt to plug holes in a pay‑as‑you‑go retirement system that is creaking under demographic pressure. Germany’s population is older, the birth rate is low and the workforce is projected to stagnate or shrink. That arithmetic threatens a model that relies on today’s workers to pay today’s retirees. Policymakers—from the centre‑right chancellery to liberal and social partners—have converged on one conclusion: the public pillar must be buttressed by capital‑backed saving that can harness market returns over the long run.

Under the plan, every eligible child aged roughly six to eighteen would receive the monthly top‑up in a personal securities account. Unless families choose otherwise, the funds would be invested in a low‑cost, global equity index strategy with strict limits on fees and risk. The account would roll forward into adulthood and could accept voluntary contributions from the saver, with withdrawals restricted until retirement. In other words: a small, universal nudge early in life and a flexible, privately managed pension wrapper thereafter.

Proponents stress that the sums are symbolic at first—€120 a year is not going to transform any household’s balance sheet. But advocates in business and finance argue that starting early and sticking with a diversified portfolio for forty‑plus years creates a powerful compounding effect. More important, they say, is the cultural shift: by opening an account for every pupil and making initial deposits automatic, the state hopes to turn stock‑market investing from a niche pursuit into a social norm. German households have long preferred cash and insurance products to equities; ministers want to change that.

The youth subsidy does not stand alone. In parallel, Berlin is working on a new generation of “individual, capital‑backed and privately managed retirement savings accounts”—informally known as Altersvorsorgedepots—to sit alongside, and eventually replace, Germany’s creaking Riester system. Earlier drafts envisaged a proportional state top‑up of 20 cents for every euro saved, capped at €600 a year for €3,000 of annual contributions, with additional bonuses for low‑income savers and young entrants. While details remain in flux, the thrust is clear: simpler products, equity exposure by default, and far stricter discipline on costs and transparency than past efforts.

Supporters frame the combined push as a behavioural nudge rather than a budget‑busting reform. Because the youth payments are small and spread across many years, the fiscal cost is modest in the early phase. For households, the hope is that a publicly seeded account lowers the barrier to adding their own money—first with pocket‑money‑sized sums, later via payroll deduction. The long maturation period means market downturns are more likely to be bumps rather than disasters, provided portfolios are globally diversified and fees are kept low.

None of this has silenced sceptics. Trade unions and social‑policy advocates call the €10‑a‑month idea too small to matter and too long‑dated to address retirees’ immediate needs. They worry the policy could entrench inequality if better‑off families are the ones who add voluntary contributions while lower‑income households struggle to do so. Consumer groups, scarred by the fee‑heavy history of subsidised private pensions, warn that mis‑selling and opaque costs could erode the very returns the reform seeks to harness.

Design will decide who is right. Three choices loom largest. First, the default portfolio. If the state sets up the account and makes the first deposits, the default must be ultra‑simple, globally diversified and low‑fee, with a glidepath that keeps a high equity share for decades and only gradually de‑risks as retirement approaches. Choice should be available, but complexity should not. Second, governance and costs. A platform model—where multiple providers compete to manage the default fund under tight fee caps—could keep charges in check and limit political interference. Third, inclusion. A universal €10 is easy to explain; fairness will hinge on whether there are enhanced top‑ups for low‑income families, starter bonuses when young adults make their first voluntary deposits, and simple payroll‑saving options once people enter work.

Markets, too, have a stake. Germany’s capital markets are shallow relative to the country’s economic weight. Shifting household savings from deposits to diversified funds would, over time, channel more long‑term capital toward German and European companies and deepen the investor base for equity and bond issuance. That ambition sits neatly alongside Brussels’ push for a stronger Capital Markets Union. But trust is the scarce commodity. To build it, the government will have to keep politics out of portfolio choices, insulate the operating entity from short‑term meddling and communicate with unusual clarity about risk and time horizons.

There is also the matter of timing and political credibility. The new government has promised to stabilise the statutory pension while restoring fiscal discipline and boosting growth. That is a delicate balancing act. Demography is relentless: as the baby‑boomer bulge continues to retire through the 2030s, contributions from a smaller working‑age cohort must stretch further even as federal budget transfers to the system grow. A youth subsidy costs little in the near term and may pay off decades later—but it cannot, on its own, close the gap that opens in the next few budget cycles.

So why do it at all? Because small, well‑designed nudges can change habits at scale. The experience of countries such as Sweden and the UK suggests that automatic enrolment, simple defaults and ruthless attention to costs can lift participation and improve long‑term outcomes. Translated to Germany, a publicly seeded youth account could familiarise millions with investing before they earn a first pay cheque. If paired with adult accounts that are genuinely simple and good value, the reform could, over time, create a thicker equity culture and a sturdier second pillar—one that complements, rather than replaces, the public system.

The yardsticks for success will be unglamorous. Are fees capped at a level that passes on the lion’s share of market returns? Is the default fund genuinely global and diversified? Do low‑income families participate at the same rates as the well‑off, thanks to enhanced subsidies and clear communication? Are providers chosen through competitive, transparent processes, and are they held to account on performance and service? Above all, does the political class resist the temptation to tweak portfolios in response to every market wobble?

Even its champions admit the youth subsidy will not “solve” the pension problem. Germany still needs to boost productivity, attract skilled immigrants, raise employment among older workers and modernise public finances. But the direction of travel matters. By nudging today’s schoolchildren toward investing—and giving adults a simpler, cheaper vehicle to keep saving—Berlin is trying to build a bridge between an ageing present and a more sustainable retirement landscape. If the reform avoids the pitfalls of the past and sticks to the principles of simplicity, low cost and inclusion, the modest €10 deposits of 2026 could be remembered less for their size than for what they set in motion: a culture that lets ordinary savers ride out volatility and share in long‑term growth.

—
Reporting based on: Financial Times coverage of Germany’s €10 monthly ‘early‑start pension’ for school‑age children (Aug 2025); Associated Press/Michael Kappeler (via AP/dpa) reports confirming Friedrich Merz as Chancellor (June 2025); Bundestag debate on private retirement reform and Altersvorsorgedepots (Dec 4, 2024); German Council of Economic Experts policy brief outlining a €10 per‑child monthly starting‑capital concept (2024); and consumer finance explainers summarising draft features of the Altersvorsorgedepot including a 20‑cent‑per‑euro top‑up capped at €600 a year.